Kratom Research Institute

Policy · 2026-07-13

American Kratom Association Warns Consumers Not to Let 7-OH Industry Hijack Federal Comment Process

Source: American Kratom Association

Why it matters

The AKA's split from 7-OH manufacturers represents a major fracture within the kratom industry at the most critical regulatory moment in years. Understanding the distinction these advocates draw between natural kratom leaf and semi-synthetic 7-OH products is essential for following the federal rulemaking now underway.

The big picture

When the DEA filed its temporary scheduling notices for 7-OH in July 2026, manufacturers of concentrated 7-OH products urged natural kratom leaf consumers to flood the HHS Request for Information with opposition comments — framing the action as an attack on all kratom. The AKA, which successfully pushed back against a 2016 DEA attempt to schedule all kratom, rejected this framing. The organization drew a sharp line between traditional botanical kratom and chemically manipulated 7-OH opioid products, arguing the two are fundamentally different.

Key findings

What they say

"Consumers who care about natural kratom are being set up," said Mac Haddow, Senior Fellow on Public Policy for the American Kratom Association. "The 7-OH industry manufactured a crisis, dressed up high-potency opioids as kratom, and now wants to hide behind the very consumers it put at risk."

Bottom line

The AKA's position — protect natural kratom leaf by clearly separating it from synthetic 7-OH opioids — has split the kratom advocacy community and shapes the politics of the federal rulemaking process.