Kratom Research Institute

Policy · 2026-02-09

ASTHO Policy Primer: State Health Officers Navigate Patchwork of Kratom Regulations as Federal Action Stalls

Source: Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO)

Why it matters

State health officers are on the front lines of the kratom and synthetic 7-OH crisis, yet federal regulation remains absent. ASTHO's policy primer helps health departments understand the current legal landscape and what tools states have used to act.

The big picture

In the absence of FDA or DEA scheduling action, more than 30 states introduced kratom-related legislation in 2024–2025, with some passing full bans and others enacting consumer protection laws. This has created a fragmented patchwork that complicates enforcement, cross-border commerce, and consumer safety.

Key findings

What they say

"The conflicting nature of the proposed legislation showcases the controversies involving kratom and differing perspectives of its use and safety," wrote ASTHO policy analyst Heather Tomlinson.

Bottom line

With FDA action stalled and DEA yet to schedule synthetic 7-OH, states are operating in a regulatory vacuum—passing widely varying laws that leave consumers and health officials without consistent federal guidance.