Kratom Research Institute

Policy · 2026-07-02

SABER Scientists Back DEA's 7-OH Scheduling as a 'Science-Based Distinction' From Natural Kratom

Source: News-Press Now / SABER

Why it matters

SABER (Scientific Association for Botanical Education and Research) represents researchers and medical professionals studying kratom. Their endorsement of DEA's targeted approach adds scientific credibility to the regulatory distinction between natural leaf kratom and synthetic or concentrated 7-OH derivatives.

The big picture

The DEA's two Notices of Intent represent a carefully drawn line — scheduling synthetic and concentrated 7-OH while explicitly preserving access to natural botanical kratom below the threshold. Scientific and research organizations like SABER view this distinction as essential: treating all kratom-related products identically would stifle legitimate research and harm consumers who depend on natural products.

Key findings

What they say

"Federal agencies reviewed the available evidence and drew a careful line between natural kratom and the concentrated and synthetic products that have raised serious public health concerns. Making that distinction is essential to protecting consumers without discarding a botanical with a long history of traditional use," said Thomas Brendler, PhD, Chair of SABER's Steering Committee.

Bottom line

The Scientific Association for Botanical Education and Research endorses DEA's targeted 7-OH scheduling, calling it a constructive science-based outcome that protects consumers from dangerous synthetic products while preserving access to natural botanical kratom.