Kratom Research Institute

Policy · 2026-04-08

The Evolving Kratom Policy Landscape: Bans, Scheduling, and Consumer Protection Acts

Source: Rockefeller Institute of Government

Why it matters

This comprehensive policy analysis maps the three primary legislative approaches states are pursuing—outright bans, controlled substance scheduling, and consumer protection acts—providing critical context for the rapidly evolving kratom regulatory landscape.

The big picture

Nearly every state introduced kratom legislation in the 2025-26 session, with approaches diverging sharply. Some states opt for bans (Wisconsin, Indiana, Alabama); others schedule 7-OH as Schedule I (Kansas, Connecticut); still others establish consumer protection acts with testing, labeling, and age restrictions. Recent state wins include Connecticut's ban and Nebraska's consumer protection act.

Key findings

What they say

The states have become the primary policymakers. For those states looking to act on kratom, three primary policy preferences have emerged: ban, schedule as a controlled substance, or create a commercial market with limitations and regulations. — Rockefeller Institute analysis

Bottom line

States are pursuing three distinct regulatory strategies—bans, controlled substance scheduling, and consumer protection acts—reflecting fundamental disagreement over whether kratom poses unacceptable risks or offers potential benefits under regulation.