Kratom Research Institute

Policy · 2026-08-14

Three States Move on Kratom in the Same Week: Massachusetts, North Dakota, and Minnesota Take Different Paths

Source: Becker's Behavioral Health

Why it matters

The three approaches, an emergency Schedule I order, an executive order plus pharmacy board rule, and a purchase-age increase, show state regulators are experimenting with different tools rather than converging on one model, which means the legal status of kratom will keep varying sharply by state.

The big picture

The moves follow the FDA's 2025 recommendation that consumers avoid 7-OH products and the DEA's July 2026 action to temporarily place 7-OH and three related substances into Schedule I. The American Kratom Association supported Minnesota's more moderate age-restriction approach, signaling industry may prefer regulation over prohibition.

Key findings

What they say

American Kratom Association senior fellow Mac Haddow said consumers should avoid products lacking clear ingredient labels and serving-size recommendations, attributing safety concerns to highly concentrated 7-OH products rather than natural leaf kratom.

Bottom line

**States are testing three different regulatory models at once, outright ban, emergency scheduling, and age restriction, so kratom's legal status will remain a patchwork rather than settle into one national standard anytime soon.**