Kratom Research Institute

Policy · 2026-01-31

Washington State Weighs Three Competing Kratom Bills — From a 95% Tax to a Consumer Protection Framework

Source: Washington State Standard

Why it matters

Washington's three-bill approach illustrates the national policy divide in real time: a prohibitive tax that would effectively price kratom out of the market versus a consumer protection model that many other states have already passed. The outcome will likely influence how other states approach the same question.

The big picture

Washington state currently has no kratom-specific regulations. Three competing bills reflect the core fault lines in U.S. kratom policy: maximize taxation to reduce access, ban synthetic 7-OH while leaving natural kratom accessible, or establish the Kratom Consumer Protection Act framework already adopted in 19 states. Small business groups, addiction medicine physicians, and the American Kratom Association all weighed in with opposing views.

Key findings

What they say

We have people exhibiting opiate-like addiction not just from fentanyl or heroin, but from things that they can buy at a gas station. I think that is extremely concerning and we should take action.

Bottom line

Washington State's three-way split on kratom regulation mirrors the national debate — and how these bills land will help define the template for states still undecided.